Playground › Catalog › Schedule Monte Carlo
SM

Schedule Monte Carlo

🟢 Production-Ready🕐 updated 2026-10-06 ✅ 4.8/5 🔷 SkillSpec L3 ⚙ ships an executable helper pm-calculators

Project completion as a distribution, not a date — Monte Carlo over the task graph. Use when a plan's finish date came from summing 'likely' estimates (it's wrong, mathematically), when leadership needs a commit date, or when you need to know which tasks actually control the timeline. Produces P10/P50/P90 completion, per-task criticality (how often each task sits on the critical path), and a real .xlsx — via the bundled zero-dependency simulator, deterministic with a seed.

▶ Run it free — no key needed 📝 Grade your existing draft 📱 Use as an app View SKILL.md ↗ What changed

🗣 Say this to your agent

“When will this project really finish?”“Leadership needs a commit date.”“Simulate our schedule instead of summing estimates.”“Which tasks actually drive the end date?”

What to give it

▸The task list with three-point estimates — per task: optimistic / likely / pessimistic (any consistent unit) and dependencies. Honest pessimistics are the whole game: "what if the API vendor ghosts us for two weeks" belongs in that number.
▸Simulation count and seed (optional) — (optional; defaults 5,000 and a fixed seed — results are reproducible).

✅ The bar it holds itself to

Every skill in this library self-verifies — these are this skill's own quality checks, straight from its definition.

✓The simulation ran (output quoted); percentiles were never eyeballed
✓The deterministic-vs-P50 gap is stated explicitly and first — it is the finding most rooms need
✓Criticality is reported per task and drives the "watch these" recommendation
✓Pessimistic estimates were interrogated: if every task's pessimistic is likely×1.2, say the inputs are optimistic theatre and the output inherits it
✓Internal-vs-external commitment dates are both named

⚠️ What it refuses to do

Do not present P50 as "the date" — the median loses half the time, by definition
Do not let uniform ±20% estimates pass silently — real uncertainty is lumpy, and flat inputs mean nobody thought about failure modes
Do not hide the deterministic number — showing plan-math next to real-math is how the method earns adoption
Do not add hidden buffers on top of P90 — the whole point is replacing padding with arithmetic
Do not simulate a 200-task plan at task granularity — roll up to workstreams; precision theatre at that scale is its own lie

Install

npx pm-claude-skills add --agent claude   # or codex · cursor · gemini · hermes
# or one-line MCP (every skill, any client):
claude mcp add pm-skills -- npx -y -p pm-claude-skills pm-claude-skills-mcp

Start with

Related skills

🔌 Embed this skill

Drop this on your blog, docs, or site — it renders a "Run this skill" card:

<div data-pm-skill="schedule-monte-carlo"></div>
<script src="https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/embed.js" async></script>

💬 Discussion

Schedule Monte Carlo is one of 1307 open-source professional AI agent skills — all SkillSpec L3. Try them all in the browser · ⭐ Star on GitHub · Browse the full catalog