What do I need to use Regulator Eyes?

The marketing material; What evidence exists; Jurisdiction / vertical (optional).

Is Regulator Eyes free to use?

Yes — run it free in the browser playground (no API key needed for the sponsored trial, or bring any provider key), or install it into Claude Code, Cursor, ChatGPT and more via npx pm-claude-skills. MIT-licensed and open source.

Regulator Eyes

Q: How do I know the Regulator Eyes output is good?

The skill verifies itself against its own quality checks: Implied claims and omissions are inventoried, not just literal sentences; Every 🔴 names the specific missing substantiation, not "needs evidence"; Puffery is honestly rated 🟢 — inflating everything to red destroys the signal; The letter cites the user's actual claims verbatim.

🔵 Stable🕐 updated 2026-10-06 🔷 SkillSpec L3 pm-simulators

Read your marketing claims, landing page, or ad copy the way a consumer-protection investigator would (FTC/ASA framing) and draft the inquiry letter they could send. Use when asked to check my marketing claims, read this like a regulator, audit my landing page for claim risk, or is this ad compliant. Produces a claim inventory with substantiation demands, the inquiry letter, and a fix-or-drop debrief per claim.

▶ Run it free — no key needed 📝 Grade your existing draft 📱 Use as an app View SKILL.md ↗ What changed

🗣 Say this to your agent

“Check my marketing claims.”“Read this like a regulator.”“Audit my landing page for claim risk.”“Is this ad compliant?”

What to give it

▸The marketing material — landing page text, ad copy, emails, app store listing (paste it)

▸What evidence exists — studies, data, guarantees infrastructure (or "none yet" — that's an answer)

▸Jurisdiction / vertical (optional) — (optional) — default to US FTC framing; flag if health, finance, or children's products (higher bar)

✅ The bar it holds itself to

Every skill in this library self-verifies — these are this skill's own quality checks, straight from its definition.

✓Implied claims and omissions are inventoried, not just literal sentences

✓Every 🔴 names the specific missing substantiation, not "needs evidence"

✓Puffery is honestly rated 🟢 — inflating everything to red destroys the signal

✓The letter cites the user's actual claims verbatim

✓Every red/yellow claim gets a concrete verdict with replacement wording where kept

⚠️ What it refuses to do

Do not grade intent — grade the net impression on a reasonable consumer

Do not invent claims the material doesn't make; the inventory quotes the source

Do not offer "add an asterisk" as a fix for a deceptive net impression — disclosures cure omissions, not lies

Do not treat testimonials as safe because they're "just customers talking" — typicality is the user's problem

Do not stay in character in the debrief

Install

npx pm-claude-skills add --agent claude   # or codex · cursor · gemini · hermes
# or one-line MCP (every skill, any client):
claude mcp add pm-skills -- npx -y -p pm-claude-skills pm-claude-skills-mcp

Related skills

🔌 Embed this skill

Drop this on your blog, docs, or site — it renders a "Run this skill" card:

<div data-pm-skill="regulator-eyes"></div>
<script src="https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/embed.js" async></script>

💬 Discussion

Regulator Eyes is one of 1307 open-source professional AI agent skills — all SkillSpec L3. Try them all in the browser · ⭐ Star on GitHub · Browse the full catalog