Playground › Catalog › Metric Gaslighting Detector
MG

Metric Gaslighting Detector

🔵 Stable🕐 updated 2026-10-06 ✅ 5/5 🔷 SkillSpec L3 pm-warroom

Find out how a dashboard, KPI report, or metrics slide is lying to you — before you repeat its story in a bigger room. Use when numbers feel too tidy, a narrative rests on one chart, or you inherited metrics you didn't define. Produces a deception audit: every metric graded for the eleven classic distortions (denominator games, survivorship, y-axis crimes, cherry-picked windows…), the story the data would tell under honest framing, and the three questions to ask the metric's owner.

▶ Run it free — no key needed 📝 Grade your existing draft 📱 Use as an app View SKILL.md ↗ What changed

🗣 Say this to your agent

“These numbers feel too tidy.”“Is this dashboard lying to me?”“Audit this KPI report before I present it.”“I inherited these metrics: can I trust them?”

What to give it

▸The metrics artifact — the dashboard description, KPI table, chart, or the numbers with their labels exactly as presented. Include axis ranges, time windows, and any annotations; the lie usually lives there.
▸The claim being made with it — (if any) — "churn is under control", "the launch worked". The audit tests the *claim-data* connection, not the data alone.

✅ The bar it holds itself to

Every skill in this library self-verifies — these are this skill's own quality checks, straight from its definition.

✓Every 🔴 names the specific mechanism and what the conclusion becomes without it — "misleading" alone is not a finding
✓At least one metric is graded 🟢 or the audit admits the artifact gave nothing to clear — all-guilty audits read as motivated
✓The honest retelling uses only the numbers present — the detector doesn't smuggle in its own speculation
✓Questions are answerable from data the owner plausibly has, and none contain an accusation
✓Distortion names from the list are used consistently so repeated audits build a shared vocabulary

⚠️ What it refuses to do

Do not accuse people of lying — the framing is "what belief does this arrangement create vs what the data supports"; most gaslighting dashboards are self-deception forwarded
Do not grade a metric 🔴 for a distortion that doesn't change the decision at hand — severity is about consequences, not purity
Do not demand data that doesn't exist as a gotcha — the three questions must be realistically answerable
Do not rewrite the numbers — the honest retelling reframes; it never adjusts figures
Do not skip auditing metrics that support conclusions you like — run the eleven on the favourable ones first

Install

npx pm-claude-skills add --agent claude   # or codex · cursor · gemini · hermes
# or one-line MCP (every skill, any client):
claude mcp add pm-skills -- npx -y -p pm-claude-skills pm-claude-skills-mcp

Related skills

🔌 Embed this skill

Drop this on your blog, docs, or site — it renders a "Run this skill" card:

<div data-pm-skill="metric-gaslighting-detector"></div>
<script src="https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/embed.js" async></script>

💬 Discussion

Metric Gaslighting Detector is one of 1307 open-source professional AI agent skills — all SkillSpec L3. Try them all in the browser · ⭐ Star on GitHub · Browse the full catalog